Summary
On April 10, 2026, Guangdong province held a press conference to announce the release of three pilot documents aimed at advancing AI-powered education across the province’s primary and secondary schools. These documents supplement the binding provincial AI curriculum regulations issued in April 2025.
Documents Released
-
AI Literacy Framework for Educators — defines five core competency areas for teachers:
- AI awareness
- Educational philosophy
- Knowledge and skills
- Practical classroom applications
- Social responsibility
-
AI Literacy Framework for Students — focuses on:
- Ethical use of AI technology
- Cultivation of computational thinking skills
- Progressive skill development from primary (experience/familiarisation) through junior high (understanding/application) to senior high (design/innovation)
-
Comprehensive Curriculum Guideline — reaffirms minimum class-hour requirements:
- Grades 1–4: no fewer than 6 hours/year
- Grades 5–6: no fewer than 10 hours/year
- Grades 7–8: minimum one hour every two weeks
Significance
Guangdong is noted as the leading province in China to introduce formal AI literacy frameworks at this level of specificity, setting a national precedent. The teacher framework defines distinct competency areas rather than just requiring participation in training — a more detailed standard than the original 2025 curriculum regulations.
Scoring Note
Dim 4 (teacher training mandated): The teacher AI literacy framework formalises and defines specific competency standards for teacher training, strengthening the existing mandate established in the April 2025 curriculum regulations. Current score of 1 is maintained; the framework defines training content but there is no direct evidence of dedicated funding independent of curriculum budget. The “pilot” designation indicates these documents may still be in a trial phase before full provincial enforcement.
No score change applied. The development supports continued scoring of dim 4 = 1 and is noted as a signal that defined standards now exist, which may inform future scoring revisions if binding enforcement and dedicated funding are confirmed.