Paraguay
11%
3/28
AI Gap Index
0/10
Schools
0/8
Workforce
3/6
Governance
0/4
Access
Schools 0/10
D1 AI literacy curriculum exists in schools 0
D2 Curriculum is binding law or mandate 0
D3 Ethics component included in curriculum 0
D4 Teacher training mandated and funded before rollout 0
D5 Dedicated funding attached to the requirement 0
Workforce 0/8
D6 Employers legally required to train all employees 0
D7 Training must cover ethics and critical evaluation 0
D8 Pre-redundancy training obligation exists 0
D9 Workers have rights when AI used in employment decisions 0
Civil Service & Governance 3/6
D10 Civil servants working with AI must receive training 1 Supreme Court Resolution 12,677 establishes a named institutional AI governance framework for the judiciary with ethics, transparency, and human oversight principles; sector-specific, not a full national AI regulator [2]
D11 Minimum training standard is defined 1 MITIC launched AI training for civil servants in e-government applications (voluntary, not binding standard); judiciary resolution requires legal professional training as part of AI adoption [1], [2]
D12 Enforcement mechanism exists with named authority 1 Supreme Court resolution contains binding rules with disclosure requirements when AI influences judicial decisions; enforcement applies within judiciary only [2]
Public Access 0/4
D13 Free or publicly funded AI literacy resources available 0
D14 Digital infrastructure support for schools and institutions 0
Index history
May 25, 2026 3/28 Supreme Court Resolution 12,677 establishes binding AI governance framework for judiciary with ethics, transparency, human oversight, and disclosure requirements.
March 27, 2026 1/28 Initial research: Limited public AI governance activity; voluntary civil servant training only